お知らせ

News

全て

イベント

プレスリリース

お知らせ

メディア掲載

コラム

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

無料の税務・会計ツールを公開しました｜議事録作成・給与計算・税務期限・ふるさと納税など

お知らせ

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

KK vs. GK: The Complete Comparison Guide for Foreigners

Column

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

年末年始休業のお知らせ

お知らせ

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

【お知らせ】LOOK UP ACCOUNTINGのホームページをリニューアルしました

お知らせ

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

freee Advisor Day 2025にLOOK UP ACCOUNTINGが登壇しました

イベント

Orange Flower

【お知らせ】無料ウェブセミナーのご案内：賢い節税&法人化がまるわかり

お知らせ

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

【イベント参加レポート】2025年「freee TOGO World」に参加いたしました

イベント

Lilac Flower

「法人化タイミングと節税のポイント」ウェビナーにて登壇いたしました

お知らせ

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

LOOK UP ACCOUNTINGが「実務経営 月刊実務経営ニュース 11月号『既成の枠にとらわれない発想と組織力で成長を続ける株式会社LOOK UP』」に掲載されました

メディア掲載

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

代表・米満がNTTドコモ グループ事業推進部にて生成AI活用セミナーの講師を務めました

お知らせ

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

【お知らせ】freeeの新サービスに専門家コメントを寄稿いたしました

お知らせ

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

【メディア掲載】KaikeiZineに寄稿しました

メディア掲載

Green Fern

【登壇レポート】freee Advisor Day 2025 in 福岡に参加しました

イベント

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

仮想通貨税務に関する情報発信プロジェクトを本格始動しました

プレスリリース

Purple Flower

【お知らせ】スポット・オンライン税務相談のご案内

お知らせ

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

ScanSnap公式メディア「Digi UP!」にLOOK UP ACCOUNTINGが取材協力しました

メディア掲載

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

「最高の店舗経営マネージメント」アーカイブ配信公開

メディア掲載

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

LOOK UP ACCOUNTINGがfreee認定税理士検索で世田谷地区（下北沢）No.1に

プレスリリース

全て

イベント

プレスリリース

お知らせ

メディア掲載

コラム

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

無料の税務・会計ツールを公開しました｜議事録作成・給与計算・税務期限・ふるさと納税など

お知らせ

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

代表・米満がNTTドコモ グループ事業推進部にて生成AI活用セミナーの講師を務めました

お知らせ

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

KK vs. GK: The Complete Comparison Guide for Foreigners

Column

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

【お知らせ】freeeの新サービスに専門家コメントを寄稿いたしました

お知らせ

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

年末年始休業のお知らせ

お知らせ

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

【メディア掲載】KaikeiZineに寄稿しました

メディア掲載

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

【お知らせ】LOOK UP ACCOUNTINGのホームページをリニューアルしました

お知らせ

Green Fern

【登壇レポート】freee Advisor Day 2025 in 福岡に参加しました

イベント

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

freee Advisor Day 2025にLOOK UP ACCOUNTINGが登壇しました

イベント

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

仮想通貨税務に関する情報発信プロジェクトを本格始動しました

プレスリリース

Orange Flower

【お知らせ】無料ウェブセミナーのご案内：賢い節税&法人化がまるわかり

お知らせ

Purple Flower

【お知らせ】スポット・オンライン税務相談のご案内

お知らせ

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

【イベント参加レポート】2025年「freee TOGO World」に参加いたしました

イベント

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

ScanSnap公式メディア「Digi UP!」にLOOK UP ACCOUNTINGが取材協力しました

メディア掲載

Lilac Flower

「法人化タイミングと節税のポイント」ウェビナーにて登壇いたしました

お知らせ

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

「最高の店舗経営マネージメント」アーカイブ配信公開

メディア掲載

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

LOOK UP ACCOUNTINGが「実務経営 月刊実務経営ニュース 11月号『既成の枠にとらわれない発想と組織力で成長を続ける株式会社LOOK UP』」に掲載されました

メディア掲載

Comparison table of KK (Kabushiki Kaisha) and GK (Godo Kaisha) for foreigners setting up a company in Japan. KK formation cost: approx. 220,000–240,000 yen (electronic filing); GK: approx. 60,000–100,000 yen. KK requires Articles of Incorporation notarization; GK does not. KK has higher social credibility; GK is somewhat lower. Bank account opening is relatively smooth for KK; can be disadvantageous for GK. KK requires public disclosure of accounts; GK does not. Officer term limits: KK 2 years by default; GK none. Profit distribution: KK fixed by shareholding ratio; GK freely customizable. Stock issuance and IPO: KK yes; GK no. Administrative burden: KK somewhat higher; GK lower. Minimum capital: 1 yen for both (1M+ yen recommended). Corporate tax rate: same for both KK and GK. Limited liability: yes for both, limited to investment amount.

LOOK UP ACCOUNTINGがfreee認定税理士検索で世田谷地区（下北沢）No.1に

プレスリリース

ご契約までの流れ

Onboarding Flow

お客様のお話をしっかりとお伺いした上で、
サービスのご提案をさせていただきます。

1

初回のご相談

税務会計や経営のことなど、 お気軽にご相談ください。 ご要望やご不安をしっかりお伺いします。

Step 1

1

初回のご相談

税務会計や経営のことなど、お気軽にご相談ください。 ご要望やご不安をしっかりお伺いします。

Step 1

1

初回のご相談

税務会計や経営のことなど、お気軽にご相談ください。 ご要望やご不安をしっかりお伺いします。

Step 1

2

プランのご提案

お聞かせいただいた内容をもとに、最適なサービス内容とお見積もりを提案いたします。 ご要望やご質問がありましたら、ぜひお聞かせください。

Step 2

2

プランのご提案

お聞かせいただいた内容をもとに、最適なサービス内容とお見積もりを提案いたします。 ご要望やご質問がありましたら、ぜひお聞かせください。

Step 2

3

ご契約

サービス内容とお見積もりにご納得いただいた後、契約となります。 ご契約内容に関しても丁寧に説明いたしますので、ご安心ください。

Step 3

3

ご契約

サービス内容とお見積もりにご納得いただいた後、契約となります。 ご契約内容に関しても丁寧に説明いたしますので、ご安心ください。

Step 3

3

ご契約

サービス内容とお見積もりにご納得いただいた後、契約となります。 ご契約内容に関しても丁寧に説明いたしますので、ご安心ください。

Step 3

お問い合わせ

Contact us

お気軽にお問い合わせください。

下記の該当フォームより、
お気軽にお問い合わせください。

お問い合わせはこちら

〒155-0031
東京都世田谷区北沢3丁目27番4号 立木ビル2Ｆ

お車でお越しの方
駐車場はないため、近隣のパーキングを
ご利用ください

電車でお越しの方
下北沢駅（京王井の頭線・小田急線）より徒歩4分

LOOK UP ACCOUNTING （米満建太郎税理士事務所）
公認会計士・税理士
公認会計士登録番号：43539｜税理士登録番号：151201　

© 2026 LOOK UP ACCOUNTING.
All rights reserved.

プライバシーポリシー

特定商取引法に基づく表記

お問い合わせ

お問い合わせ